 |
|
The Case of Charles Pigott: Contained in The Defence He Had Prepared, and Which Would Have Been Delivered by Him on His Trial, If The Grand Jury Had Not Throws Out The Bill Preferred Against Him
Charles Pigott
Paperback. Gale, Making of Modern Law 2012-02-20.
ISBN 9781275510777
|
|
|
|
Buy from Amazon.co.uk
|
Publisher description
Full Title:The Case of Charles Pigott: Contained in The Defence He Had Prepared, and Which Would Have Been Delivered by Him on His Trial, If The Grand Jury Had Not Throws Out The Bill Preferred Against Him
Description: The Making of the Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926 collection provides descriptions of the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey" trial.Trials provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class, marriage and divorce.
++++
The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure edition identification:
++++
Monograph
Harvard Law School Library
London: Printed for D.I. Eaton, No. 74, Newgate-Street. 1793
More books by Charles Pigott
Similar books
Rate the book
Write a review and share your opinion with others. Try to focus on the content of the book. Read our instructions for further information.
The Case of Charles Pigott: Contained in The Defence He Had Prepared, and Which Would Have Been Delivered by Him on His Trial, If The Grand Jury Had Not Throws Out The Bill Preferred Against Him
Book reviews » The Case of Charles Pigott: Contained in The Defence He Had Prepared, and Which Would Have Been Delivered by Him on His Trial, If The Grand Jury Had Not Throws Out The Bill Preferred Against Him
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
